Skip to content

Team workspace digest

Generated 2026-10-04 11:29 UTC by scripts/workspace_digest.py from jeraddunne/csc580-group9-msr2027. Do not edit by hand; see README.md.

Who is working on what

@AllieHgs (1)

Issue Title Milestone
#51 Onboarding: Allie Hodges (@AllieHgs) Formation

@angel06la (2)

Issue Title Milestone
#50 Onboarding: Leticia Aderhold (@angel06la) Formation
#14 S1: dataset acquisition or sampling instructions and data dictionary Sprint 1

@hinak786 (1)

Issue Title Milestone
#52 Onboarding: Hina Kramer (@hinak786) Formation

@jeraddunne (32)

Issue Title Milestone
#80 Guided labelling studio for round 1 and round 2 labels Sprint 2
#67 [Decision] Sample only or full dataset for RQ1 to RQ3 (ADR-0007) Sprint 1
#61 Assignment 2 Phases B and F: notebook elicitation and RESEARCH_SPEC Sprint 1
#53 Validation: choose the teammate second rater for each label kind Sprint 2
#42 Start here: Group 9 project workspace (P-01) Formation
#40 Final: AI-use log and disclosure complete Finalization
#39 Final: individual contribution and reflection (one per member) Finalization
#38 Final: presentation and live demonstration Finalization
#37 Final: repository release v1.0.0 and fresh-machine reproduction by a non-author Finalization
#36 Final: respond to feedback and finalize the report Finalization
#35 S3: retrospective identifying the group's most important process improvement Sprint 3
#34 S3: final demonstration plan and presentation materials Sprint 3
#33 S3: documented release or tagged version of the repository Sprint 3
#32 S3: threats-to-validity section (dataset bias, measurement error, confounding, missing data, reproducibility, general... Sprint 3
#31 S3: complete draft report with citations and clear separation of findings and interpretation Sprint 3
#30 S3: final figures and tables generated from the repository pipeline Sprint 3
#29 S3: error analysis and manually inspected examples Sprint 3
#28 S3: robustness checks, sensitivity analysis, or comparison across meaningful subgroups Sprint 3
#27 S3: final or near-final results addressing the research question Sprint 3
#26 S2: sprint review package and retrospective recording changes to question, method, scope, or interpretation Sprint 2
#25 S2: updated research report (background, method, implementation, preliminary results) Sprint 2
#24 S2: preliminary results with reproducible figures or tables Sprint 2
#23 S2: validation sample, manual annotation protocol, or other evaluation design Sprint 2
#22 S2: automated tests for parsing, transformation, matching, or metric functions Sprint 2
#20 S1: sprint review package and retrospective Sprint 1
#19 S1: baseline process metrics captured (Measure phase) Sprint 1
#17 S1: repository practice: issues, milestones, branch protection, first reviewed pull request Sprint 1
#14 S1: dataset acquisition or sampling instructions and data dictionary Sprint 1
#11 Kaizen: weekly process metrics automated Formation
#10 Kaizen: 48-hour pull request review SLA by a member other than the author Formation
#5 Formation: RESEARCH_QUESTION.md completed and topic brief submitted Formation
#1 Formation: team working agreement v2.0 signed by all four members Formation

Work sign-ups

Member Sprint 1st 2nd 3rd Hours Wants issues Issue
Hina Kramer (@hinak786) Sprint 2 W6 Testing, CI, and reproducibility W1 Research framing and related work W10 Process and Lean Six Sigma metrics 4 to 6 #82

Findings (issues labelled finding)

No findings filed yet. Use the Research finding form.

Decisions (issues labelled decision)

Issue Decision Decide by State
#67 Sample only or full dataset for RQ1 to RQ3 (ADR-0007) Thu 2026-10-01 (Sprint 1 check-in 2) open
#53 Validation: choose the teammate second rater for each label kind open
#4 Formation: ballot vote tallied and topic decided (ADR-0004) decided